In 1920, a newspaper editor named Herbert Bayard Swope looked at the page across from his paper's editorials and saw a mess — book reviews, obituaries, and leftover copy with nowhere else to go. He had an idea: what if that page was clearly and only opinion, kept separate from the news pages, so readers always knew which one they were looking at?
That idea is where the term "op-ed" comes from — literally, the page opposite the editorial. It sounds obvious now. It wasn't, at the time. Before that, opinion and reporting often blurred together on the same page with no clear line between them. Swope's real innovation wasn't the opinions themselves — it was drawing a boundary and labeling it, so the reader didn't have to guess which side of the line they were on.
A century later, that boundary has mostly dissolved again — not because anyone made a single decision to remove it, but because feeds, headlines, and video don't come with a page layout that tells you which side you're standing on. So it's worth being able to sort it yourself. There are really three categories to watch for, not two.
Fact: something that can be checked and either confirmed or disproven, independent of who's saying it. "The bill passed the Senate 51–49" is a fact. You can go verify it.
Opinion: a value judgment or prediction that can't be fact-checked the same way, because it's about what should happen or what something means, not what did happen. "This bill is a mistake" is an opinion. Reasonable people can disagree, and no amount of fact-checking settles it.
Framing: the one people most often miss. Framing is presenting a real fact in a way that quietly steers you toward a particular opinion about it — without ever stating the opinion outright. "Officials refused to answer questions" and "Officials declined to comment, citing an ongoing investigation" can describe the exact same event. Both might be technically accurate. One makes the officials sound evasive; the other makes them sound procedural. Neither is a lie. But they're not neutral, either.
Framing is what makes this trickier than just "check if it's true." A fact can be 100% accurate and still be doing persuasive work through what's included, what's left out, and which words carry the weight.
A quick way to check which one you're looking at:
- Can this claim be proven false with evidence? → It's a fact (or a false claim dressed as one).
- Does it depend on values, priorities, or predictions about the future? → It's an opinion.
- Is it a true fact, but the word choice or ordering seems to be nudging you toward a conclusion? → That's framing, and it's worth noticing even when nothing in it is technically wrong.
None of this means every piece of writing needs to be robotically neutral — plenty of good writing has a clear point of view, and that's fine as long as it's honest about being one. The goal isn't to strip framing out of everything you read. It's just to notice it's there, the same way Swope wanted readers to notice which page they were on.
Solitaire FactStack drops one media literacy fact into every game of Klondike solitaire you play — free, ad-supported, and built to make you a little sharper one hand at a time. Play free now →